Internet users everywhere are thirsty
for more bandwidth. Even in the developed countries, such services are only
now becoming widely available. Analog modems, limited as they are to
something less than 5,000 bytes per second, are gradually giving way to
digital technologies. Cable modems and various flavors of the Digital
Subscriber Line (DSL) are the leading contenders for the next generation of
Internet connections. Even newer technologies, such as ground-based wireless
systems and two-way satellite links are still in the early development
phase.
Pent-up Demand
In Latin America, where Internet use lags behind the developed markets by
2-4 years, new digital broadband connections are set to leapfrog earlier
technologies and level the playing field at least for businesses and
affluent consumers.
Cable and DSL have been launched in larger Latin American cities only
very recently. In Mexico City, for example, cable Internet access will not
arrive until December, and DSL is only six months old. Likewise, Brazilian
and Argentinean users who live in the right areas gained access to cable and
DSL only this year. Users are well aware of the bandwidth available in
developed countries and are clamoring to get on the bandwagon. There is a
huge backlog of pent-up demand, at least for those providers that can offer
competitive pricing.
There is much speculation about which technology will eventually
dominate. The most likely outcome is that DSL will prevail in business
markets, while cable will at least initially claim a larger share of the
residential market. Both technologies will get a boost from the fact that
the region's poor quality telephone systems presently limit the availability
and functionality of dial-up connections over analog modems. This makes
digital broadband even more appealing in relative terms. Another
consideration is that local phone tolls, (in Mexico after an initial 100
free calls per month) add significantly to the cost of dial-up Internet
access. In Argentina, for example, it costs US$ 0.80 per hour to use a local
dial-up connection during prime time hours, in addition to ISP charges.
Price is Still an Obstacle
Consumers and businesses alike have a strong desire to plug into broader
bandwidth. But for consumers, wants do not translate into demand in the
absence of adequate disposable incomes. The typical monthly cost of between
US$ 50 and $70 for DSL or cable is substantial relative to average incomes.
In Brazil, for Example, 80 percent of households have spending power of less
than US$ 500 per month. The situation is comparable in Mexico and even in
Argentina - which has a relatively large middle class - half the population
is in households with less than about $1,000 per month in spending power.
For now, therefore, residential broadband Internet is a luxury item aimed
mainly at the affluent. The good news is that even though the wealthy and
professional classes are small in proportionate terms, they include at least
13 million households in the three big markets (Brazil, Mexico and
Argentina) alone.
Competitors Scramble to Fill the Bandwidth Gap
Entrenched telecom firms are vying with cable providers and broadband
start-ups to grab market share in this nascent industry. While competition
is driving prices down, explosive volume growth among businesses and
affluent consumers is likely to more than compensate, generating huge
revenues for suppliers that move quickly to move into key markets.
Established national telephone service providers like Telmex in Mexico,
Embratel in Brazil and Telecom and Telefónica in Argentina have already
made their moves. Telmex began offering DSL service to residential customers
in 19 cities in March 2000. While business broadband communications-only
services had previously been offered at much higher prices, the new
residential service, in partnership with Prodigy, incorporates ISP services,
with a total cost of about US$ 63 per month, after a $100 installation fee.
In Brazil, DSL service is available in the main cities at a cost of US$
55 per month. The Mexican and Brazilian services are both relatively low
speed versions of DSL technology, with the Brazilian service offering a
downstream of 256k bits per second. Higher speed services are available at
much higher prices. In Argentina, high speed DSL service has recently been
offered at prices in excess of $500 per month. Consumer-oriented services
are anticipated in the near future.
DSL services are most attractive to business customers, particularly
since they are offered in faster versions at higher prices. While DSL uses
ordinary copper telephone lines, it suffers from the disadvantage that it
requires expensive equipment at exchanges and is effective only within
limited distances of DSL equipped central facilities. Cable Internet access
is more suited to residential customers, since it operates over the existing
cable television network, which is more likely to pass by residences than
businesses.
|
NUMBER
OF SUBSCRIBERS - CABLE
|
|
|
Mexico
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
|
2000
|
44
|
60
|
21
|
|
2001
|
88
|
90
|
37
|
|
2002
|
154
|
180
|
74
|
|
2003
|
270
|
315
|
110
|
|
2004
|
404
|
473
|
165
|
|
NUMBER OF
SUBSCRIBERS - DSL
|
|
|
Mexico
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
|
2000
|
42
|
85
|
20
|
|
2001
|
84
|
213
|
40
|
|
2002
|
252
|
425
|
90
|
|
2003
|
567
|
744
|
203
|
|
2004
|
851
|
1116
|
304
|
Teledensity
Given the relatively low Internet penetration in Latin America so far,
estimated at only about 6 million subscribers for the entire region,
broadband services are likely to "leapfrog" older technologies for
new users, many of whom do not have ready access to second telephone lines.
Wireline service is often available only after long waiting periods and with
substantial deposits. DSL provides both voice and data communications on the
same existing line. Cable does not require a phone line at all.
Argentina has the highest wireline penetration of any of the major Latin
American markets with about 8.5 million residential phone lines to serve a
population of 37 million. At the other end of the scale, Mexico has fewer
than 10 million residential lines to serve a population of nearly 100
million. Even in Brazil, which has a relatively strong communications sector
in other respects, there are only 21 telephone lines for every 100
inhabitants. Second telephone lines are mainly a luxury enjoyed by upper
income households.
Cable service offers an important alternative for many customers. In the
short term, this technology is very attractive to the affluent households
most likely to have cable service. But in the long term the spread of this
access method is limited by relatively low penetration of cable TV systems
overall. Cable service is used by only 5 percent of households in Brazil and
only 11 percent of households in Mexico. Argentina has the only highly
developed cable system in the region, with service to about 60 percent of
households. From the service provider's perspective, this disadvantage is
partly offset by the fact that cable service is most prevalent in
higher-income neighborhoods, where consumers are likely to be able to afford
relatively expensive broadband services.
Wireless is Waiting in the Wings
Wireless services are the principal alternative to Cable and DSL
Broadband Internet. There are two principal approaches. Short-range wireless
systems in urban areas provide a means of leapfrogging underdeveloped
wireline infrastructure. Satellite access is the other main alternative.
Local wireless service is offered in Buenos Aires, for about US$ 80 per
month. Wireless systems in Brazil and Mexico, on the other hand, are limited
and aimed mainly at high-end business customers. Nonetheless, these services
are expected to expand dramatically from a few thousand customers today, to
around a million by 2005. The advent of portable Internet devices will
accelerate this trend.
Satellite-based systems offer even greater potential, but their
availability, performance and pricing are still the subject of speculation.
For example, Hughes Network Systems has announced that it will add two-way
capabilities to its existing DirecPC high-speed satellite Internet service.
Presently this service requires a regular dial-up modem or other Internet
connection for upstream communications. The new system will not require a
supplementary connection and will offer always-on service. A number of
competitors are scrambling to bring similar systems to market, including
iSky, which promises Latin American service during 2001.
These systems are likely to spread very quickly, since they require no
local infrastructure and they operate from satellites over the equator
providing a footprint that covers most of the Americas. Observers predict
pricing in the range of US$ 70 per month. The Hughes system and a competing
service from the DISH network will offer the option of combining Internet
service with direct-to-home television services on the same dish. Both
services are set to roll out in the US by the end of the year.